There Is No War on Men Fashion Video

Support SouthFront

Igor Strelkov

Dear FRIENDS. IF YOU Like THIS Type OF CONTENT, SUPPORT SOUTHFRONT Piece of work:

PayPal: southfront@cyberspace.ru

Donation alerts: https://donationalerts.com/r/southfront

Gumroad: https://gumroad.com/southfront

Or via: http://southfront.org/donate/ or via: https://world wide web.patreon.com/southfront,

BTC: 3Gbs4rjcVUtQd8p3CiFUCxPLZwRqurezRZ,

BCH ABC: qpf2cphc5dkuclkqur7lhj2yuqq9pk3hmukle77vhq,

ETH: 0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9

The situation in Eastern Ukraine is disquisitional. Russian federation and Ukraine are on the brink of an open up armed conflict. In this context, many military experts suggest their opinions and forecasts on the military developments in the region. The position of famous warlord Igor Strelkov is definitely 1 that deserves special attention.

He became popular during the then-called Crimean Spring in 2014. Strelkov took office in the process of the Crimean unification with Russia, after which in Eastern Ukraine, he was ane of the first who organized an open resistance to the nationalist forces that had earlier staged a coup in Kiev. During his military activity, he became more and more critical of Kremlin's factual position. Co-ordinate to his later statements, the situation in Donbass remains close to disastrous due to the policy of the definite role of the Russian elite. Asserting his views, Strelkov fifty-fifty got in conflict with the Russian President'south adviser at that time Vladislav Surkov. As a result, Strelkov was forced to leave Eastern Ukraine and lost the opportunity to influence in the state of affairs in the region.

In credo, Strelkov'south vision may be characterized in terms that today become known every bit "Orthodox socialism." This concept is based on justice, conciliarity, national unity and social responsibility.

Strelkov is widely known equally a strong supporter of the and so-called "Russian earth" concept. This term despite the using of the discussion "Russian" has nothing to do with nationalism or a hurrah-patriotic adherence to the ideas of monarchism.

"The Russian world (Pax Rossica) is the social totality associated with Russian culture. Russkiy Mir is the cadre culture of Russian federation and is in interaction with the diverse cultures of Russia through traditions, history and the Russian linguistic communication. It comprises also the Russian diaspora with its influence in the world. The concept is based on the notion of "Russianness", and both accept been considered ambiguous. The Russian earth and awareness of it arose through Russian history and was shaped past the respective flow.

The term received a new sound in the 21st century against the background of the restoration of the foreign policy influence of the Russian land, on the one hand, and the intensifying attacks on Russian civilisation and the Russian language in the former Soviet republics, on the other.

Today the "Russian earth" is often indicated as a threat in speeches of Moscow's geopolitical rivals, justifying the demand to contain Russian federation."

In the politic field, Strelkov is a supporter of the disciplinarian stiff Russian state, where social life is based on the principles indicated above.

In war machine terms, during the hostilities in 2014-2015 and to the present, he claimed that the merely chance to ensure peace in Eastern Ukraine was a full participation of the Russian army and taking command of the Ukrainian territory at to the lowest degree to the Dnieper River.

Thus, Igor Strelkov is a rather controversial person. However, he is i of the few alive warlords of the 2014-2015 menses, who deeply knows the situation within the region, simultaneously being a dogged critic of Kremlin policy. His analysis is very valuable for predicting the state of affairs and simulation of possible developments.

"At the cease of the twenty-four hours:

1. The war between Russia and Ukraine is inevitable, but at the moment (in Apr), it is very likely;
2. For Russia and the Russian People, war "now" is preferable to state of war later;
3. The USA now will not fight for Ukraine with 99% probability;
4. Comments were disabled, I will not answer clarifying questions in private messages." – Strelkov wrote in Telegram and Vkontakte.

On April 4, he published a mail service on his Telegram channel reflecting his opinion on the current state of affairs in Eastern Ukraine. At that place were 3 principal ideas:

The outset one was that the war between Russian federation and Ukraine is inevitable, but at the moment (in April), it is very likely.

Many war machine experts agree with his stance most state of affairs in the region.

The evolution of the current political situation in Russia, whatever directions information technology would move in, sooner or later will lead to an armed conflict with Ukraine. No affair which side would instigate the conflict. If the power remains in the easily of the and then-called "Putin's team", the conflict volition develop co-ordinate to the electric current scenario and, equally a event, well-nigh likely it will deliquesce into armed one in short or mid terms. Fifty-fifty in instance of radical changes in Russian federation and the coming to power of pro-Western opposition, the escalation would non be avoided. The Ukrainian military thought is based on the cadre ideas of deoccupation of the Eastern regions and taking command, in its further advance, over a good role of Russian territory. For case, information technology is referring to the Rostov, Krasnodar and even Volgograd regions. Thus, the weakening of Russia every bit a outcome of internal political turmoils may pb to the decision of the current Ukrainian leadership to start a major armed forces operation in the regions with strategic goal to give checkmate to the Russia.

Secondly, for Russian federation and the Russian People, state of war "at present" is preferable to war later.

Igor Strelkov adheres to this position throughout the entire conflict in Ukraine. The longer the conflict drags on, the more the nationalist government that came to power in Ukraine strengthens. At the aforementioned time in Russian federation, the so-called "Crimean effect", i.e. social excitement, build-up caused by Russian geopolitical successes in 2014-2016, is weakening. In previous years, this phenomenon contributed to increase the level of support for the Putin'southward government.

Today, when the conflict in Eastern Ukraine has been persisting for 7 years, any attempts to settle it peacefully are ineffective. Considering the complicated political situation in Russian federation, there are no signs that the current government has establish a recipe to forbid further internal deterioration. Thus, the longer the hot phase of the conflict would exist postponed, the worse the conditions of the Russian side would exist.

In its turn, the hot phase of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine may become a kind of medicine necessary for Moscow that would be used as an internal unifying cistron.

Thirdly, the USA at present will not fight for Ukraine with 99% probability.

Firstly, one should take into account the electric current domestic political situation in the U.s.a., where a transitional period with the new government is taking identify. A participation in a war machine conflict is possible only if at that place are threats to a key marry of the Americans, which Ukraine is not.

Secondly, the global strange policy situation is not favorable for the deployment of US forces far beyond the state'south borders. The Biden administration must first of all confront the growing global influence of China, which is likewise likely to be indirectly involved in the armed services disharmonize in Ukraine, for example, through financial support. On April 2, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov received Zhang Hanhui, Ambassador of the People's Commonwealth of China to the Russian Federation. The exact topics that were discussed during the negotiations were not unveiled, but it is not difficult to assume that the war machine escalation in the Donbass region became office of the talks.

At the same time, the position of the United States in the Middle Due east is not stable. The Biden assistants is actively working to regulate the relations with primal partners in the region, developing its position on the principal issues, including the Iranian nuclear deal, the Syrian crisis, the situation in Iraq, etc.

At the moment, Washington has a number of problems of paramount importance for maintaining its global influence, which does not allow it to openly intervene in the budgeted war in Ukraine. Yet, in the near hereafter, in a year or more, the Biden administration volition strengthen US positions in cardinal regions. Nothing volition be able to contain it.

More ON THE TOPIC:

• Kremlin Replies On Situation In Eastern Ukraine
• Kiev Continues On The War Path, Emboldened By False Promises (Map Update)

Support SouthFront

Share this post